Senator Russ Feingold's Progressive Patriots Fund wants your help identifying a Congressional challenger to support in the upcoming 2006 elections. The candidate chosen by the grassroots as a Progressive Patriot will receive a $5000 contribution from the Progressive Patriots Fund. These candidates were selected by you through the candidate suggestion form, and we hope to do more of these events in the future.

Thank you to all those who voted in "Pick a Progressive Patriot;" voting is now closed. Be sure to check back soon to find out who won! If you'd like to sign up to join the Progressive Patriots Fund, please fill out the form below.

* denotes required field

PO Box 628008
Middleton, WI 53562
Phone: (608) 831-1308 | Fax: (608) 831-1348

© 2005. Progressive Patriots Fund. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy.

Powered by Blue State Digital

There are people that argue that it is really a matter of security, an regrettable still essential fact of our publish 9/11 planet. Additionally, there are those that acknowledge this minute being a pivotal stage while in the heritage of American liberty, that a line has plainly been crossed - a line that if not swiftly reclaimed, will inevitably give solution to a quickly downward spiral into complete statism.

This article is much more for that later compared to former, a lot more for people who recognize the duty; the moral duty of civil disobedience... for those who selected for being free of charge. Numerous wince with the mere mention of any immediate disobedience towards authority, and so are pretty perfectly just to go along with what they are instructed, or place their hope in the legal method or voting. But for all those who are not frightened of pressure, for anyone ready to consider direct-action, a overview of 1 in the founders of immediate action can be suitable.

In his now popular Letter from Birmingham Jail, Dr. King eloquently covers the subject of civil disobedience. In the outset from the letter, Dr. King gives four measures demanded for any nonviolent direct-action campaign. These steps are worthy of evaluation and some reflection for the people that may be participating in thenational TSA physique scanner opt-out.

The first factor that has to be identified, could be the legitimacy with the induce. It need to be identified no matter if civil disobedience is justified in the offered predicament. Would be the result in just a rebellion of whim, dependant on some subjective typical of temporary want? Or relatively, does the conflict derive from the friction concerning one's very own conscience and an exterior injustice i.e., a violation with the fundamental rights from the particular person. The first step then is always to collect a assortment of specifics to rationally determine if an injustice does actually exist. This isn't a course of action of checking the newest public opinion polls, but a gathering of facts surrounding individual testimonies of violations which can be measured towards the typical of purely natural regulation. Not the legislation that's on paper published by bureaucrats, for that is the regulation that is definitely straight in dispute, but somewhat the natural legislation of justice. As St. Augustine the moment reported inside the Metropolis of God, an unjust regulation is no legislation whatsoever.

If it's been plainly determined that an injustice does actually exist, then the first action is an try at negotiations. For a long time there has become critical questions elevated in regards to the constitutionality of a number of the safety measures taken because of the recently established Department of Homeland Protection. No louder outcry may be heard than the a person produced final week by John Tyner, who took a stand and started a revolt with his words, "don't touch my junk."

Even with the rising manifeste outcry in excess of the obvious violation of fourth amendment constitutional rights, John Pistole, head with the Transportation Protection Administration, mentioned "I'm not going to change those polices." Division of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano issued comparable sentiments concluding that, "if people today choose to travel by some other means, they've that proper."

John Pistole is also quoted as declaring, "On the eve of the key national holiday getaway and less than one 12 months after al-Qaeda's failed attack very last Xmas Day, it truly is irresponsible for a team to propose travelers opt from the quite screening which will stop an assault using non-metallic explosives."

This is certainly reminiscent of King's Letter the place he dealt with his adversaries, who for the time produced the charge that his protests were "untimely." King's response in small was, "I have but to engage within a direct-action marketing campaign which was 'well timed'." In fact, the essence of civil disobedience is the fact the just one engaging in direct-action is not the resource in the friction, but is simply resisting injustice as it takes put, and for him, the more "untimely" the more powerful the direct-action. The resister doesn't decide on time - the oppressor does.

Which is why a 3rd move is required when negotiations are futile in addition to a direct-action marketing campaign is if you want. That action is usually a process of self-purification in preparing for disobedience. It will take far more intestinal fortitude to resist an unjust authority, than it does to just go together with the crowd. As Thomas Paine so eloquently place it, "the summer time soldier and also the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from your services of their nation." And without a doubt they will. Don't just will they shrink, nonetheless they will also chastise individuals that select the path of resistance to unjust civil authority. So as to resist the assaults that could be made upon he who resists, a strong will, a obvious eye, and also a cleanse conscience will need to be ready before direct-action is taken.

When these three ways have last but not least been accomplished, it is really then time for direct-action. Strength never voluntarily gives up power - it only seeks a lot more energy. This prospect will likely be a test with the conviction throughout the Tea Occasion movement. Could it be a real Tea Get together compiled of people that are ready to chance own security? More, is it a motion which is willing to go thus far as to directly disobey lawful authority? Or would be the Tea Celebration composed of "summer soldiers" and "sunshine patriots" who are only superior for standing on street corners keeping signs?

When the TSA is authorized to keep on without the need of decisive resistance, then we're truly unworthy of our liberty.